Met Oracle Application Express is heel veel mogelijk. Om een indruk te krijgen wat er allemaal mogelijk is, is dit een zeer interessante link: link
Met behulp van een demo-applicatie worden vele nieuwe feautures van APEX 3.0 gepresenteerd. Van wat ik heb gezien, is dit een zeer bruikbare tool om snel een leuke webapplicatie te realiseren.
Voor wie nog meer wilt zien en de moeite wilt doen om APEX 3.0 te installeren zijn een aantal voorbeeld applicaties te downloaden bij OTN (link).
dinsdag 19 juni 2007
maandag 18 juni 2007
ADF 11G Example
Om een indruk te krijgen van de nieuwste mogelijkheden van Oracle ADF 11G is er een demo applicatie beschikbaar gesteld van een Webwinkel. Deze demo kun je hier vinden: link
Eerste indruk van de demo is zeer positief. Wel heb je een zeer krachtige pc/laptop nodig om alles lokaal te draaien.
Eerste indruk van de demo is zeer positief. Wel heb je een zeer krachtige pc/laptop nodig om alles lokaal te draaien.
maandag 11 juni 2007
Vergelijking Applicatieservers
zijn positioneerd de applicatieservers van Oracle en MS als "leaders" de de applicatieservers van ,, IBM, Sun, SAP als "strong performers."
Een-en-ander is na te lezen in The Forrester Wave: Application Server Platforms Q1 2005 (pdf).
Hiebij de belangrijkste conclusies:
"Oracle and Microsoft provide the leading platform choices. Oracle has a surprising range of functions for composite application development and management, as well as a surprising degree of integration between the components of its application platform suite. Oracle scored high on all of the Forrester Wave's Current Offering criteria but had particularly strong administration and management features, compared with the other vendors. Oracle's costs are also comparatively low, and the company has dramatically expanded its market presence during the past two years. Microsoft also scored well across the board with its features, overcoming the negative impact of incomplete integration between its platform components. The gaps between the Windows Server, BizTalk Server, and SharePoint Portal Server, for example, create boundaries between development tools, which add complexity. The same is true of management tools. Microsoft's biggest assets in the comparison, however, were its productive development tools and its strong strategy. On the Forrester Wave diagram, Microsoft's market presence appears to be smaller than it really is because Microsoft declined to provide key data for that set of scores.
IBM, BEA, SAP, and Sun are strong performers. IBM and BEA almost equaled Microsoft’s functionality scores. BEA created the market for application server platforms and has a strong product. WebLogic Platform’s current shortcomings in administration and management are scheduled to be eliminated in a 2005 release. IBM’s overall functionality is strong, but integration between its WebSphere platforms is weak. In addition, IBM’s scores also suffered because the company segments some key development and management functions into some of its other products. The strategy scores of both BEA and IBM were also driven down by their relatively high prices and other costs, compared with the leaders."
Een-en-ander is na te lezen in The Forrester Wave: Application Server Platforms Q1 2005 (pdf).
Hiebij de belangrijkste conclusies:
"Oracle and Microsoft provide the leading platform choices. Oracle has a surprising range of functions for composite application development and management, as well as a surprising degree of integration between the components of its application platform suite. Oracle scored high on all of the Forrester Wave's Current Offering criteria but had particularly strong administration and management features, compared with the other vendors. Oracle's costs are also comparatively low, and the company has dramatically expanded its market presence during the past two years. Microsoft also scored well across the board with its features, overcoming the negative impact of incomplete integration between its platform components. The gaps between the Windows Server, BizTalk Server, and SharePoint Portal Server, for example, create boundaries between development tools, which add complexity. The same is true of management tools. Microsoft's biggest assets in the comparison, however, were its productive development tools and its strong strategy. On the Forrester Wave diagram, Microsoft's market presence appears to be smaller than it really is because Microsoft declined to provide key data for that set of scores.
IBM, BEA, SAP, and Sun are strong performers. IBM and BEA almost equaled Microsoft’s functionality scores. BEA created the market for application server platforms and has a strong product. WebLogic Platform’s current shortcomings in administration and management are scheduled to be eliminated in a 2005 release. IBM’s overall functionality is strong, but integration between its WebSphere platforms is weak. In addition, IBM’s scores also suffered because the company segments some key development and management functions into some of its other products. The strategy scores of both BEA and IBM were also driven down by their relatively high prices and other costs, compared with the leaders."
Java componenten biblotheek
Op zoek naar bruikbare kant-en-klare java componenten. Dan is de volgende link wellicht interessant: link.
Op zoek naar bruikbare kant-en-klare java componenten. Dan is de volgende link wellicht interessant: link.
Vergelijking IDEs
Een zeer interessant artikel waarbij een viertal IDEs worden vergeleken: link.
Vergeleken worden:
Het oordeel over JDeveloper is: "A well-constructed package: JDeveloper is fast, intuitive, and has nearly all the features a developer would want. It does lack robust modeling support, but otherwise is a good point to start any evaluation."
Een zeer interessant artikel waarbij een viertal IDEs worden vergeleken: link.
Vergeleken worden:
- Borland JBuilder 2005 Enterprise
- IBM Rational Software Architect 6.0
- Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3
- Sun Java Studio Enterprise 7
Het oordeel over JDeveloper is: "A well-constructed package: JDeveloper is fast, intuitive, and has nearly all the features a developer would want. It does lack robust modeling support, but otherwise is a good point to start any evaluation."
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)